What's the age of the law got to do with it? It's been illegal to murder people for even longer but you still see people getting convicted of it today. If the law hasn't been repealed then it's still the law.
On what legal foundation do you say it doesn't violate their anti-trust laws? Isn't that the whole point of this process to determine if it does, or doesn't, violate the laws.
You seem to ignore how the law works, there has yet to be proved anything has broken any, trumped up, law. So what proof have you got? I do not have to defend what has yet to be established. Unlike yourself who seems to be convinced, in your head, they have.
It could well be the case that a judge, placed by Trump to make decisions in his favour, do reach a verdict on this. The problem is the company you are refering to, I assume you mean Liberty Media, only has controlling interest in the FOM, the rest being owned by a number of shareholders in holding companies around the world. Plus the commercial rights are held by FWOC. Thus they do not come under the umbrella of being American.
If Andretti is comfortable getting into bed with a bunch of politicians who still 'think' they won the last election then supported insubordination because they didn't agree with the result, are puppy killers that also support the killing of children and take away one of the fundamental rights of all women plus dictating to schools their own nasty agenda than good luck to him.
It is Andretti who is trying desperate means to force a decision his way.
I think it is time we begged to differ and moved on, what will be will be...