• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Zen 5 rumours

Associate
Joined
2 Feb 2007
Posts
1,458
Location
Belfast
The upgrade to Zen 4 would be huge for you but Zen 5 should be out in a few months. Up to you... What i will say is Zen 5 will drop in to existing AM5 motherboards.

I'm going to have to upgrade my entire rig anyway so waiting a bit and going full new machine isn't out of the question really. If it's worth it I'd just wait a few more months.
 
Associate
Joined
13 Jun 2012
Posts
348
Hopefully, AMD will also improve the memory speeds so that a supposedly 24-core Zen 5/c variant will have sufficient bandwidth to operate in a dual-channel system.
Agreed, read rumours elswhere that suggest that performance of top-end Zen5 parts may be rather soured by a dearth of bandwidth. Which may explain a separate rumour that Zen6 will include a substantial rebuild of the memory controller.

Does make me think that 8-core X3D Zen5 will be a great place for gamers to perch on for several years - as 16core will be bandwidth starved, and even Zen6 with an improved memory controller will do little more than de-starve a 16-core CPU - which will have marginal beenfit to gamers anyway.

Presuming Zen5 arrives with DDR5 6400 (native) speeds, an 8-core part should fly for gaming workloads.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Sep 2003
Posts
10,152
Location
Newcastle, UK
You could go for a new setup now based on a 7600, then just upgrade the CPU once the new Zen 5 CPUs land...
I did this coming up to about 12 months ago now. Made the move to AM5, got the board I wanted and memory, and stuck in the 7600 as a stop gap. Paid £215 for the 7600 and actually, it has been a really good CPU. Still holding its price, looks to be about £190-£200.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
7,077
I did this coming up to about 12 months ago now. Made the move to AM5, got the board I wanted and memory, and stuck in the 7600 as a stop gap. Paid £215 for the 7600 and actually, it has been a really good CPU. Still holding its price, looks to be about £190-£200.
The 7600 is surprisingly fast, I'm in no hurry to upgrade yet as it's still doing what I ask if it easily.
 
Soldato
Joined
31 Oct 2002
Posts
9,892
It is. I went from an 8 core to this 6 core and it's been impressive. Noticed no issues with gaming or anything.

Sigh, wish people wouldn't post this. I used a 7600, it chokes in Cyberpunk. CPU is literally at 100% all the time, horrible frame drops.

6 cores just not enough!
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
17,755
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
31 Oct 2002
Posts
9,892
Hmm I must be playing a different cyberpunk to you.
Maybe you're playing a different game? Here's proof of my experience with a 7600, 4090 @ 4k max details with RT enabled, from a few months ago:

MF7FqwI.jpeg


Horrible frame drops and lag spikes in the majority of built up areas. Meanwhile, smooth as silk on my 7700 and 7950x3d and 13900k chips.
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,781
Location
United Kingdom
Maybe you're playing a different game? Here's proof of my experience with a 7600, 4090 @ 4k max details with RT enabled, from a few months ago:

MF7FqwI.jpeg


Horrible frame drops and lag spikes in the majority of built up areas. Meanwhile, smooth as silk on my 7700 and 7950x3d and 13900k chips.
I remember that. Was that before the 2.0/2.1 patches? I think the demands on the CPU have increased a little. Tempting to try it on my 7950X3D by disabling all but 6 cores 12 threads.
 
Soldato
Joined
31 Oct 2002
Posts
9,892
I remember that. Was that before the 2.0/2.1 patches? I think the demands on the CPU have increased a little. Tempting to try it on my 7950X3D by disabling all but 6 cores 12 threads.
I believe so! I've not played the expansion yet, it's on my to do list! Will likely be after 5090 release, so further demand on CPU should be fun to see, good old Tom's Diner :cry:
 
Soldato
Joined
28 May 2007
Posts
18,453
Maybe you're playing a different game? Here's proof of my experience with a 7600, 4090 @ 4k max details with RT enabled, from a few months ago:

MF7FqwI.jpeg


Horrible frame drops and lag spikes in the majority of built up areas. Meanwhile, smooth as silk on my 7700 and 7950x3d and 13900k chips.

Nvidia GPU overhead strikes again.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,116
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
It’s probably more to do with the RT CPU overhead, I don’t know if AMD has a big RT CPU overhead. Disabling RT will tell just how bad the CPU overhead is.

No, the Nvidia driver uses a lot more CPU cycles than for example AMD and possibly Intel just to exist, so wherever there is a CPU bottleneck the Nvidia GPU reaches it much sooner than an AMD GPU, to such an extent that a much slower AMD GPU can be much faster than a normally much faster Nvidia GPU, we are talking 30 - 40% just because the Nvidia driver chews up that many CPU cycles.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom