I just can't fathom how you're air cooling a 13900ks or 14900f - I'm running a 13700k on a dark rock pro 4 & limiting it 180w P1 & 253w p2, with multi core enhanecment off and a light underclock via MSI's Liteload.
I can get just about stock cinebench performance unless the weather is hot - in which case it drops off a bit due to the thermal limits. Obviously, for lighter-threaded stuff it hits stock performance.
Do you just not do any multi-threaded heavy tasks (outside of shader compilation) ?
If so I can't help but think that a 13600k would be a better choice.
My having a 13700k was due to very specific circumstances - having lots of DDR4 I wanted to re-use to keep the upgrade cheaper + it was in the time when even very low end AM5 boards were £200.
I'd have a hard time recommending Intel at all in the high end now & even in low/ mid end systems, it needs to be a very specific set of circumstances where I'd recommend them.
I have done power limiting in the past but now I just set a temp limit in the bios so the cpu downclocks when it hits the temperature I’ve set.
What helps me massively is my particular sample has a high sp rating so the voltage needed to run at certain frequencies is extremely low.
I’m also undervolting by 0.05v, and running best case scenario svid behaviour.
If I ran something like cinebench I know my results would probably be lower than stock due to the throttling I’ve set, but I’m ok with that as my system still eats through anything I throw at it. This is running the 4090 at 0.975v at 80% power limit too!
My pc was massively over specced, as you say I could probably have achieved similar real world performance with lower tier parts but pc gaming is my only vice so I tend to treat myself.
Looking back I wish I had gone for a 7800X3D build. When I buy my next rig (hopefully itx) I’ll be buying the equivalent cpu to that at the time as all I do is game and browse the web.