Didn't answer any of the questions. I'll educate you as you seem to have no idea. We've got a temporary CEO right now who is our chief legal counsel. We have no football director (he's leaving). You want that guy deciding on whether we should get rid of a manager and hire a new one when he won't be in that position in 3 months?
You used to be a good poster but it's like your kid has taken over your account or something, you just sport twitter lines and avoid explaining anything.
I was simply suggesting we sack him, which doesn't require that structure in place yet. Have one of the existing coaches come in as a caretaker manager for the remainder of the season, then hire at the end of the season. Wilcox has started, Ashworth may as well be working for us, you'd be naïve to think he isn't giving input somehow unofficially, Omar Berrada is starting in the summer, so again...
Keeping a manager on for the sake of it, because there's no-one else, is mad. The fact is, he isn't good enough, so giving him a year with a proper structure does nothing, as it's not like he hasn't had 2 years to showcase what he can do, he's often been left wanting tactically and has made a number of bizarre decisions during games that has cost us. I definitely agree with you with regards to it being a bad time to look for a manager, with other clubs in the market as well who would definitely be preferred to than us, however, my point still stands that that is not a good enough reason to keep ETH in. I really do not see how a director of football, CEO and technical director all suddenly make ETH a better manager. Yes it will massively help in his recruitment, but it's not going to help his tactical ability and man management which seems questionable as well